Do you think the government should have to pay landowners for their lost profits if they are restricted in developing their property in order to save endangered species? We think the government should pay the landowners for their lost of profit (at least a little money) because it wouldn't be fair to the landowners that they lose money while the government is trying to save the warblers. The landowners should get payed a little bit because they're restricted from developing their property and that could make them lose money. What would this practice imply about individual responsibility to conserve nature? What effect would this have on taxes? This practice implies about individual responsibility to conserve nature by making the people in the world think about the environment and the animals getting endangered. This situation would have affect on taxes because if they payed the landowners for their lost profits then we would have to pay moretax. Do you think Americans have a right to urge other countries to preserve their forests if we continue to cut down our own native forests? It is okay to ask other countries to cut down their forests but what they are urging them to do is not right. If Americans want to cut down their own trees, its their point of view. Some other countries wouldn't want to cut down their native trees so, if the Americans urge them too much the other countries might feel pressured to do so even through its bad for the eco-system.
GOLDEN CHEEKED WARBLER
QUESTIONS:
Do you think the government should have to pay landowners for their lost profits if they are restricted in developing their property in order to save endangered species?
We think the government should pay the landowners for their lost of profit (at least a little money) because it wouldn't be fair to the landowners that they lose money while the government is trying to save the warblers. The landowners should get payed a little bit because they're restricted from developing their property and that could make them lose money.
What would this practice imply about individual responsibility to conserve nature? What effect would this have on taxes?
This practice implies about individual responsibility to conserve nature by making the people in the world think about the environment and the animals getting endangered. This situation would have affect on taxes because if they payed the landowners for their lost profits then we would have to pay more tax.
Do you think Americans have a right to urge other countries to preserve their forests if we continue to cut down our own native forests?
It is okay to ask other countries to cut down their forests but what they are urging them to do is not right. If Americans want to cut down their own trees, its their point of view. Some other countries wouldn't want to cut down their native trees so, if the Americans urge them too much the other countries might feel pressured to do so even through its bad for the eco-system.